question Do the streamed tables actually feel worth it to you?

Been mucking around on the real-dealer blackjack and roulette stuff lately instead of the usual RNG games, and I still can't work out if I'm properly into it or if it's just the novelty.

Some sessions feel heaps better when there's an actual person running the game and the pace is a bit closer to a proper table... then other times I'm stuck waiting on slow players, random chat, limits changing, and I'm like mate why didn't I just play the normal version.

What do you lot actually look for when you're picking where to play these? Better video quality, lower minimums, faster dealing, more blackjack variants, decent roulette tables, better baccarat, less lag?

Also keen to know if certain providers are miles better than others. A couple I've tried felt smooth as, a couple felt a bit scuffed ngl. What do you reckon?

Jake WildJackpot wrote >

Some sessions feel heaps better when there's an actual person running the game and the pace is a bit closer to a proper table...

yeah and I reckon that's mostly the novelty talking. Been on those streamed tables for ages and I stopped seeing them as some upgrade ages ago. You're basically paying for the theatre with slower hands, dead time, people taking forever to decide, all that. I only hop on when I'm in the mood for the feel of it, not because I expect a better run.

Nah, the slower pace is actually why I use them sometimes. Keeps me from rattling through decisions like an idiot. The stuff I care about is boring really, stable stream, clean interface, easy to leave a crowded table without the whole thing glitching out.

I'm sort of opposite on the speed point too, I don't want it super fast. If it's just rapid-fire spins or hands I'd rather use the instant version. What I'm still trying to work out is whether anyone deliberately picks the quieter tables with chat basically dead, because that might be the sweet spot for me.